Subset selection in noise based on diversity measure minimization
By Bhaskar D. Rao, Kjersti Engan, Shane F. Cotter, Jason A. Palmer, Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2003
342 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d40c7f467b5e60a6363f70add2540f8a7cec6fa3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- David Paul Wipf
- Bhaskar D. Rao
- Michael Elad
- Alfred Marcel Bruckstein
- Srikantan S. Nagarajan
- Matthieu Kowalski
- Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado
- Michal Aharon
In Computational Mechanics
- Bhaskar D. Rao
- Michael Elad
- David Paul Wipf
- Zhilin Zhang
- Alfred Marcel Bruckstein
- David L. Donoho
- Srikantan S. Nagarajan
- Yonina C. Eldar
In Computer Networks and Communications
- David Paul Wipf
- Bhaskar D. Rao
- Srikantan S. Nagarajan
- Matthieu Kowalski
- Alfred Marcel Bruckstein
- Michael Elad
- Zhilin Zhang
- Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado
Citations in the corpus
- Connections with Robust PCA and the Role of Emergent Sparsity in Variational Autoencoder Models (2018, background): “Consequently, the ‖µz‖22 factor from (3) serves as the only relevant influence, pushing these values to be exactly zero even though `2 norms in most regularization contexts tend to favor diverse, non-sparse representations (Rao et al., 2003).”
- Dictionary Learning Algorithms for Sparse Representation (2003, methodology): “The L-curve method works well, but it requires solving a one-dimensional optimization for each λ k , which becomes computationally expensive for large problems.”
- A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging (2009, positive): “While details and assumptions may differ γ-MAP, S-MAP, and VB can all be leveraged to obtain a point estimate of S expressed in the Tikhonov regularized form (Rao et al., 2003)”
- Iterative Reweighted 1 and 2 Methods for Finding Sparse Solutions (2010, methodology): “Many recent sparse approximation algorithms rely on iterative reweighting schemes that produce more focal estimates as optimization progresses [3], [4], [5], [11], [17], [18].”
- Sparse Signal Recovery With Temporally Correlated Source Vectors Using Sparse Bayesian Learning (2011, methodology): “This suggests the use of methods such as the modified L-curve procedure [55] or the cross-validation [37], [38] to choose λ specially in strongly noisy environments.”
- A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays (2005, background): “An attempt to apply the L-curve to a subset selection problem in noise has been made in [36], but the authors have to make an assumption that the SNR is approximately known.”
- Variational EM Algorithms for Non-Gaussian Latent Variable Models (2005, methodology): “This algorithm has also been derived in the image restoration literature [12] as the “halfquadratic” algorithm, and it is the basis for the FOCUSS algorithms derived in [26, 25].”
- Sparse Methods for Direction-of-Arrival Estimation (2016, methodology): “A regularized FOCUSS algorithm for (27) was developed in [28] by using the same main idea as in FOCUSS.”
- From Sparse Solutions of Systems of Equations to Sparse Modeling of Signals and Images (2009, methodology): “A simple strategy to attack ( Q λ 1 ) is the iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) algorithm [97, 139, 138].”
- Sparse regression using mixed norms (2009, methodology): “FOCUSS and the above generalization can be modified as in [23] to take the noise into account; however, this does not seem to be the most efficient algorithm in this case, as we shall see in the next section, where an alternative approach is also proposed.”
- Compressing Neural Networks using the Variational Information Bottleneck (2018, background): “this type of sparsity archetype instead prefers pushing some percentage to exactly zero while leaving others mostly unchanged (Rao et al., 2003).”
- Hidden Talents of the Variational Autoencoder. (2017, background): “Consequently, the ‖μz‖(2)2 factor from (3) serves as the only relevant influence, pushing these values to be exactly zero even though `2 norms in most regularization contexts tend to favor diverse, non-sparse representations [34].”
- Sparse Bayesian learning for basis selection (2004, methodology): “where we have assumed a Gaussian likelihood model, and represents a trade-off parameter balancing sparsity with quality of fit [1], [20].”
- An Empirical Bayesian Strategy for Solving the Simultaneous Sparse Approximation Problem (2007, methodology): “Third, we weigh in the M-FOCUSS algorithm derived in [7], [40] based on the generalized FOCUSS algorithm of [41].”
- Sparse solutions to linear inverse problems with multiple measurement vectors (2005, methodology): “Fortunately, the modified -curve method described in [28] and [29] as a method of choosing the regularization parameter also performs well in this context.”
- $rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation (2006, methodology): “The focal underdetermined system solver (FOCUSS) is very similar, using the -norm with as a replacement for the -norm [18]–[21].”