Agricultural research in the face of diversity, local knowledge and the participation imperative: theoretical considerations

By J. Sumberg, C. Okali, D. Reece. 2003

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4043e7212dab0d2463df0401488b8acf0dcc998

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. John Thompson
2. J. Hellin
3. J. Sumberg
4. P. Woodhouse
5. C. Leeuwis
6. L. Klerkx

Citations in the corpus

• Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious (2013, background): “Unable to articulate a coherent response that identified the potential and limitations of different kinds of participation in different research situations, many researchers, and particularly those who were not in a strong institution or funding position, were swept along by the participation impera”
• Agricultural Extension, Collective Action and Innovation Systems: Lessons on Network Brokering from Peru and Mexico (2012, background): “However, farmers participate in social change not as passive subjects, but rather as social actors whose strategies and interactions shape the outcome of development within the limits of the information and resources available (Sumberg et al., 2003).”