The Written Language Bias in Linguistics : Its Nature, Origins and Transformations

By Per Linell. 2005

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Gender Studies, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4013c3be16d133f72b94df4d786566160a22b42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. J. Gerwing
2. D. Prévost
3. Janet Beavin Bavelas
4. Robert F. Port
5. C. Sutton
6. Leelo Keevallik
7. J. E. Fox Tree
8. Jackson Tolins

In Gender Studies

1. D. Prévost
2. Janet Beavin Bavelas
3. Robert F. Port
4. C. Sutton
5. J. Gerwing
6. Leelo Keevallik
7. Maurice Nevile

In Language and Linguistics

1. J. Gerwing
2. D. Prévost
3. Kristian Tylén
4. Janet Beavin Bavelas
5. Robert F. Port
6. C. Sutton
7. Leelo Keevallik
8. Maurice Nevile

Citations in the corpus

• Dialog as interpersonal synergy (2014, background): “However, even more functional cognitive approaches (Fauconnier & Turner, 2003; Lakoff & Johnson, 1999; Talmy, 2000) seem implicitly biased toward written monologue as the model-language of study (Linell, 2005).”
• The Listener as Addressee in Face-to-Face Dialogue (2011, neutral): “In the view of many scholars, face-to-face dialogue is the basic form of language use (e.g., Bavelas & Chovil, 2000, 2006; Bavelas, Hutchinson, Kenwood, & Matheson, 1997; Chafe, 1994; Clark, 1996; Fillmore, 1981; Garrod & Pickering, 2004; Goodwin, 1981; Levinson, 1983; Linell, 2005).”
• Rich memory and distributed phonology (2010, background): “But my claim is that these powerful intuitions are at least partly (indeed probably mostly) a result of the lifelong literacy training to which all readers of this paragraph have been subjected (Faber, 1992; Linell, 2005; Olson, 1994; Port, 2006).”
• Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. (2008, methodology): “Our alternative is to propose that face-to-face dialogue with all of its natural features is the basic form of language use (e.g., Bavelas & Chovil, 2000, 2006; Bavelas et al., 1997; Clark, 1996; Fillmore, 1981; Garrod & Pickering, 2004; Goodwin, 1981; Levinson, 1983; Linell, 2005), which implies th”
• The Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax (2013, background): “There has been a written-language bias in much of linguistics (Linell, 2005).”