Wind power planning in three Swedish municipalities

By Jamil Khan. 2003

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3ce1d208a17f1dc44418932dcc1895de8e7a209

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Politics of Landscape Value: A Case Study of Wind Farm Conflict in Rural Catalonia (2009, background): “The wind energy literature abounds with suggestions to consider more participatory planning processes in order to avoid conflict (eg Bell et al, 2005; Khan, 2003; Lambert and Elix, 2005; Strachan and Lal, 2004).”
‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland (2005, background): “In some EU states, notably Denmark and Germany, energy projects are funded and controlled by local wind cooperatives (Redlinger et al., 2002; Khan, 2003 ).”
Wind power development in Sweden: Global policies and local obstacles (2007, methodology): “In his analysis, Khan [ 54 ] concludes that the way in which citizen participation is integrated into the planning process may differ a lot across Swedish municipalities.”
Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands) (2015, background): “[20] (2008), Khan [39] (2003) and Strachan and Lal [38] (2004) agree that national policy”
Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? (2010, background): “Importantly, research has also identified key ways in which opposition based upon these factors can be addressed; for example, the early and continued involvement of host communities in the decision and planning process (e.g. Devine-Wright, 2005a; Khan, 2003; Krohn and Damborg, 1999) and employment ”