The effect of presence on human-robot interaction

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Explain Yourself: A Natural Language Interface for Scrutable Autonomous Robots (2018, background): “ (AxV) now routinely operate in regions that are dangerous or impossible for humans to reach, such as the deep underwater environment. Typically, remote robots instil less trust than those co-located [1, 6]. This combined with high vulnerability in hazardous, high-stakes environments, such as that d”
Explainable Autonomy: A Study of Explanation Styles for Building Clear Mental Models (2018, background): “Typically, these remote robots instil less trust than those co-located (Bainbridge et al., 2008; Hastie et al., 2017b; Li, 2015).”
The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents (2011, background): “1Portions of the data in this study were previously reported in a conference paper [1].”
The Physical Presence of a Robot Tutor Increases Cognitive Learning Gains (2012, background): “Earlier work in this area indicates that people are more likely to comply with commands given by a physically-present robot than an onscreen video of the same robot (Bainbridge et al., 2008).”
Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development (2018, background): “Research has explored effect of a robot’s physical presence (Kidd and Breazeal, 2004; Shinozawa et al., 2005; Bainbridge et al., 2008), touch and gesture (Shiomi et al.”