Making Wildlife Viewable: Habituation and Attraction
By J. Knight. 2009
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Geography, Planning and Development, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3b08e93f2e584dbe1b766a2ffd0e35f8313ce98
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- A. Gallagher
- A. Ordiz
- J. López‐Bao
- Vincenzo Penteriani
- Serge Planes
- M. Delgado
- Johann Mourier
- Miha Krofel
Citations in the corpus
- Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism : A review (2017, background): “While the use of concealed observatories or 628 blinds is well-known to birdwatching and it is also found in other kinds of wildlife 629 viewing, they are not often used for bear viewing (Knight, 2009).”
- Shark and ray provisioning: functional insights into behavioral, ecological and physiological responses across multiple scales (2015, background): “Specifically, the viewing of emblematic wildlife has increased in popularity (Knight 2009), and the promoters of wildlife-watching point out various benefits, ranging from financial inputs to local economies to enhancing education and environmental awareness (Orams 2002), that contribute towards…”
- Biological effects, conservation potential, and research priorities of shark diving tourism. (2015, background): “We define ‘‘provisioning’’ as those activities where some type of attractant, bait, or food reward is offered for the tourism purposes of aggregating or positively reinforcing sharks to neutralize their aversion to humans (Orams, 2002; Knight, 2009; Fig.”