Information gaps in understanding the effects of noise on fishes and invertebrates

By A. Hawkins, A. Pembroke, A. Popper. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2015

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3a144ba5dcb38637225ccf382d86758a59150c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. A. Radford
2. Stephen D. Simpson
3. A. Hawkins
4. A. Popper
5. C. Radford
6. Daniel P. Costa
7. N. Merchant
8. H. Slabbekoorn

In Ecology

1. A. Radford
2. Stephen D. Simpson
3. C. Radford
4. A. Hawkins
5. A. Popper
6. Carlos M. Duarte
7. Daniel P. Costa
8. N. Merchant

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Stephen D. Simpson
2. Carlos M. Duarte
3. Daniel P. Costa
4. M. Meekan
5. E. Staaterman
6. F. Juanes
7. B. Halpern
8. A. Radford

Citations in the corpus

• The soundscape of the Anthropocene ocean (2021, background): “Anthropogenic noise can interfere with natural auditory signal processing by marine animals, an effect termed “masking” (83), which reduces their communication space [see (84) for marine mammals, (85) for fishes].”
• A sound approach to assessing the impact of underwater noise on marine fishes and invertebrates (2017, background): “…Webb et al., 2008; Ladich and Fay, 2013; Ladich, 2014 Part 3: Assessing effects Normandeau, 2012a; b; Hawkins and Popper, 2014; Popper et al., 2014; Hawkins et al., 2015; Edmonds et al., 2016; Lucke et al., 2016a out all these projects, but it is imperative that they be proposed so that regulators…”