Possible long-term decline in impact rates: 2. Lunar impact-melt data regarding impact history

By W. Hartmann, C. Quantin, Nicolas Mangold. 2007

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d39a59dd47306bb6271dd67e0964c03787c770b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. Stefano Mottola
2. Matteo Massironi
3. Caleb I. Fassett
4. Gabriele Cremonese
5. Simone Marchi
6. Stuart J. Robbins
7. Mark A. Wieczorek
8. R. Wordsworth

In Atmospheric Science

1. Caleb I. Fassett
2. Simone Marchi
3. Stuart J. Robbins

Citations in the corpus

• A NEW CHRONOLOGY FOR THE MOON AND MERCURY (2008, background): “For instance, Hartmann et al. (2007) raised doubts about the interpretation of lunar melts and glasses data; while Neukum & Ivanov (1994) argued against the LHB on the basis of the smooth behavior of their lunar chronology curve.”
• Crater degradation on the lunar maria: Topographic diffusion and the rate of erosion on the Moon (2014, background): “…lunar impact flux is generally believed to have been within a factor of a few of steady [e.g., Hiesinger et al., 2012], with some suggesting it is modestly decreasing [Craddock and Howard, 2000;Hartmann et al., 2007;Minton andMalhotra, 2010] or increasing [McEwen et al., 1997; Culler et al., 2000].”