Inside the integrated assessment models: Four issues in climate economics
By E. A. Stanton, F. Ackerman, Sivan Kartha. 2009
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3885d938453d00b65082e13ea2f41a6d33fa442
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Zhimin Huang
- Zhifu Mi
- D. V. van Vuuren
- Yi-Ming Wei
- Bas J. van Ruijven
- Elmar Kriegler
- Volker Krey
- Charlie Wilson
Citations in the corpus
- Climate policy modeling: An online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review (2015, background): “In other words, how many regions, industries, fuels, abatement technologies, or end uses to include in a model [79].”
- Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality (2011, background): “3 There are several varieties of climate-economics models: welfare optimization, general equilibrium, partial equilibrium, simulation, and cost minimization models (see Stanton et al. 2009 ).”
- Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation (2017, background): “(20) discusses the applications and limitations of process-based and benefit-cost integrated assessment models in mitigation analysis (also see Stanton, Ackerman and Kartha (131) for a comparative review).”
- Interesting times: winners, losers, and system shifts under climate change around Australia (2011, unknown): “of temperature change (Stanton et al., 2008).”