Are ‘mating systems’ ‘breeding systems’ of inconsistent and confusing terminology in plant reproductive biology? or is it the other way around?

By P. R. Neal, Gregory J. Anderson. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2005

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3879ed541b1603c69fe85377fd9a37569b46ee4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. I. Carrillo-Angeles
2. C. Martínez-Peralta
3. M. Mandujano
4. J. Golubov

Citations in the corpus

• Reproductive Biology of Cactaceae (2010, background): “Variations in sexual expression at an individual plant (e.g., monoecious, dioecious), morphological (herkogamy, distyly and heterostyly) or physiological (self-incompatibility, dichogamy) level of the female or male sexual function (breeding systems sensu Neal and Anderson 2005 ) are mechanisms tha”