Rutile saturation in hydrous siliceous melts and its bearing on Ti-thermometry of quartz and zircon

349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

New thermodynamic models and revised calibrations for the Ti-in-zircon and Zr-in-rutile thermometers (2007, methodology): “Approximate values of DV 0 1 1⁄4 4:51 cm and DV 0 10 1⁄4 6:27 cmð1 cm 1⁄4 1 kJ/GpaÞ were computed from 25 C and 1 bar molar volume data for zircon, rutile and a-quartz in Holland and Powell (1998), for ZrO2 with the rutile structure cited in Degeling (2003), and for ZrTiO4 in Troitzsch and Ellis (20”
Partial melting of lower crust at 10–15 kbar: constraints on adakite and TTG formation (2013, methodology): “7c) also agree with former experiments (Ryerson and Watson 1987; Hayden and Watson 2007; Xiong et al. 2009).”
Rutile solubility in H2O, H2O–SiO2, and H2O–NaAlSi3O8 fluids at 0.7–2.0 GPa and 700–1000 °C: Implications for mobility of nominally insoluble elements (2008, background): “The Hayden and Watson (2007) equation for H2O–rutile-saturated Amelia albite melt yields 4200 ppm Ti, and Eq.”
Ti-in-zircon thermometry: applications and limitations (2008, background): “Hayden and Watson (2007) show that Ti diffusion in melt is 2–3 times faster than Zr and thus that sluggish diffusion of Ti will not restrict equilibration of a growing zircon.”