Effects of resource availability on mycelial interactions and 32P transfer between a saprotrophic and an ectomycorrhizal fungus in soil microcosms

By B. D. Lindahl, J. Stenlid, R. Finlay. 2001

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Defining nutritional constraints on carbon cycling in boreal forests – towards a less `phytocentric' perspective (2002, background): “on the outcome of their competitive interactions with ectomycorrhizal fungi (Lindahl et al., 2001).”
Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface (2009, background): “Acquisition of N (Bending and Read 1995) and P (Lindahl et al. 2001) by ectomycorrhizal fungi colonising organic substrates is dependent on resources allocated to the mycelium.”
Tamm Review: On the nature of the nitrogen limitation to plant growth in Fennoscandian boreal forests (2017, background): “…saprotrophic and ECM fungi as indicated by inhibited growth in natural soil of both ecological groups of fungi in the zones where the mycelia interact (Leake et al., 2002), and the size of the C supply to the respective fungal guild determines the outcome of the interaction (Lindahl et al., 2001).”
Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest. (2007, background): “In soil microcosms we have previously observed antagonistic interactions between saprotrophic fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi (Lindahl et al., 1999), in which the outcome was strongly influenced by the amount of substrate available to the saprotrophs (Lindahl et al., 2001).”