Scale and trends in species richness: considerations for monitoring biological diversity for political purposes

By D. Weber, Urs Hintermann, A. Zangger. 2004

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d36aed84ca14ff4f3c8ccca0879d1c342bf713cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Marc Kéry
2. B. R. Schmidt
3. J. Andrew Royle
4. T. Beebee
5. R. Griffiths
6. James D. Nichols

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Marc Kéry
2. B. R. Schmidt
3. G. Guillera‐Arroita
4. Douglas H. Johnson
5. M. Hutchings
6. J. Andrew Royle

In Plant Science

1. Marc Kéry
2. M. Hutchings

Citations in the corpus

• Imperfect detection and its consequences for monitoring for conservation (2008, background): “Only detection/nondetection data need to be collected across a large number of sites, and these are usually easier and cheaper to collect than abundance data in large-scale monitoring programs (Weber et al. 2004, Joseph et al. 2006).”
• Environmental predictors of species richness in forest landscapes: abiotic factors versus vegetation structure (2016, unknown): “We obtained species richness data from surveys conducted within the Swiss Biodiversity Monitoring Program (BDM, Journal of Biogeography 43, 1080–1090 ª 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 1081 Weber et al. (2004)).”