Computing Highly Correlated Positions Using Mutual Information and Graph Theory for G Protein-Coupled Receptors
By S. Fatakia, Stefano Costanzi, Carson C. Chow. 2009
24 citations recorded by the source corpus.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a superfamily of seven transmembrane-spanning proteins involved in a wide array of physiological functions and are the most common targets of pharmaceuticals. This study aims to identify a cohort or clique of positions that share high mutual information. Using a multiple sequence alignment of the transmembrane (TM) domains, we calculated the mutual information between all inter-TM pairs of aligned positions and ranked the pairs by mutual information. A mutual information graph was constructed with vertices that corresponded to TM positions and edges between vertices were drawn if the mutual information exceeded a threshold of statistical significance. Positions with high degree (i.e. had significant mutual information with a large number of other positions) were found to line a well defined inter-TM ligand binding cavity for class A as well as class C GPCRs. Although the natural ligands of class C receptors bind to their extracellular N-terminal domains, the possibility of modulating their activity through ligands that bind to their helical bundle has been reported. Such positions were not found for class B GPCRs, in agreement with the observation that there are not known ligands that bind within their TM helical bundle. All identified key positions formed a clique within the MI graph of interest. For a subset of class A receptors we also considered the alignment of a portion of the second extracellular loop, and found that the two positions adjacent to the conserved Cys that bridges the loop with the TM3 qualified as key positions. Our algorithm may be useful for localizing topologically conserved regions in other protein families.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Learning generative models for protein fold families (2011, neutral): “Others have since developed similar methods [29, 30, 31].”
- 3D structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing (2012, neutral): “Previous work has attempted to use correlations between residues, among other methods, to predict structural proximity and functional features (Cronet et al., 1993; Fatakia et al., 2009; Fuchs et al., 2007; Go¨bel et al., 1994; Horn et al., 1998; Nemoto et al., 2004).”
- Finding and Leveraging Structure in Learning Problems (2012, unknown): “Others, [72, 76, 78], have since developed similar methods.”