Mass-conservative finite volume methods on 2-D unstructured grids for the Richards’ equation

By Gianmarco Manzini, S. Ferraris. 2004

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d354ecfc7091e7e09c33a7d3e038c5c44f207f28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Pierre Sochala
2. O. L. Le Maître
3. Claudio Paniconi
4. Mario Putti
5. Anthony Nouy
6. Xiaoliang Wan
7. G. Em Karniadakis
8. Dongbin Xiu

In Computational Mechanics

1. O. L. Le Maître
2. Claudio Paniconi
3. Mario Putti
4. Pierre Sochala

Citations in the corpus

• Polynomial Chaos expansion for subsurface flows with uncertain soil parameters (2013, methodology): “…(DG) method is chosen for the space discretization of Richards’ equation because this type of method ensure local conservation as finite volumes (Manzini and Ferraris 2004) [38] and mixed finite elements (Knabner and Schneid 2002) [31] and have highorder accuracy as finite elements (Celia and…”
• Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook (2015, methodology): “These include integrated finite difference, finite difference with nonorthogonal grids, finite volume, mixed finite element, analytic element, and cellular automata methods [Narasimhan and Witherspoon, 1976; Strack, 1976; Putti et al., 1990; Beckie et al., 1993; Eymard et al., 1999; Manzini and Ferr”