Reference-Dependent Preferences and the Risk-Return Trade-Off
By Huijun Wang, Jinghua Yan, Jianfeng Yu. 2017
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper studies the cross-sectional risk–return trade-off in the stock market. A fundamental principle in finance is the positive relation between risk and expected return. However, recent empirical evidence suggests the opposite. Using several intuitive risk measures, we show that the negative risk–return relation is much more pronounced among firms in which investors face prior losses, but the risk–return relation is positive among firms in which investors face prior gains. We consider a number of possible explanations for this new empirical finding and conclude that reference-dependent preference is the most promising explanation.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d336cba462529f6c214e4be381efa69057ff4818
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Nicholas Barberis
- Doron Avramov
- Allan G. Timmermann
- Massimo Guidolin
- Michael W. Brandt
- Jessica A. Wachter
- A. Shleifer
- Yihong Xia
In Finance
- Nicholas Barberis
- Doron Avramov
- Allan G. Timmermann
- Massimo Guidolin
- Michael W. Brandt
- Jessica A. Wachter
- A. Shleifer
- Yihong Xia
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Psychology-based Models of Asset Prices and Trading Volume (2018, methodology): “Wang et al. (2017) propose a different application of diminishing sensitivity to asset prices.”