The base-rate fallacy and the difficulty of intrusion detection
By Stefan Axelsson. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security, 2000
733 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d32865d2c97e7b216af94b1d7ef53fed80bf0667
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Andrew J. Clark
- Jonathan J. Davis
- David A. Cieslak
- Ali Akbar Ghorbani
- Nitesh V. Chawla
- Mahbod Tavallaee
- Monowar Hussain Bhuyan
- Jugal Kumar Kalita
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Andrew J. Clark
- Jonathan J. Davis
- Ali Akbar Ghorbani
- Mahbod Tavallaee
- Monowar Hussain Bhuyan
- Jugal Kumar Kalita
- Dhruba Kumar Bhattacharyya
- Mohammad Ali Salahuddin
In Signal Processing
- Gabriel Maciá-Fernández
- Pedro Garcia-Teodoro
- Victor C. M. Leung
- Lihua Huang
- Monowar Hussain Bhuyan
- J. D. Verdejo
- Andrew J. Clark
- Luo Si
Citations in the corpus
- Network Anomaly Detection: Methods, Systems and Tools (2014, background): “1) Accuracy: Accuracy is a metric that measures how correctly an IDS works, measuring the percentage of detection and failure as well as the number of false alarms that the system produces [223], [224].”
- Credit card fraud detection: A fusion approach using Dempster-Shafer theory and Bayesian learning (2009, background): “Axelsson [22] has pointed out that due to the base-rate fallacy problem, the factor limiting the performance of an intrusion detection system is not the ability to identify intrusive behavior correctly but its ability to minimize false alarms.”
- A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities (2018, background): “For SSH traffic, it achieves 95.9%DR and 2.8% FPR on theDalhousie dataset, 97.2% DR and 0.8% FPR on the AMP dataset, and 82.9% DR and 0.5% FPR on the MAWI dataset.”
- Experimental Study with Real-world Data for Android App Security Analysis using Machine Learning (2015, background): “In addition, PRC can reveal the e↵ect of the base-rate fallacy [7] in which while the overall percentages of benign apps incorrectly rejected is low, the count is still orders of magnitude greater than the count of those correctly rejected.”
- Limiting the Impact of Stealthy Attacks on Industrial Control Systems (2016, background): “This quantity has a couple of advantages over the false alarm rate: (1) it addresses the deceptive nature of low false alarm rates due to the base-rate fallacy [5], and (2) it addresses the problem that several anomaly detection statistics make a decision (“alarm” or “normal behavior”) at non-consta”
- A new approach to intrusion detection using Artificial Neural Networks and fuzzy clustering (2010, background): “The following measurements are often proposed to evaluate the detection precision of IDS (Axelsson, 2003): true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives.”
- Electricity Theft Detection in AMI Using Customers’ Consumption Patterns (2016, background): “As argued in [19], due to the base-rate fallacy phenomenon, the false alarm rate is the limiting factor for the performance of an intrusion detection system (IDS).”
- A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set (2009, methodology): “Besides, the performance measure applied in DARPA’98 Evaluation, ROC Curves, has been widely criticized, and since then many researchers have proposed new measures to overcome the existing deficiencies [8], [9], [10], [11], [12].”
- TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and Time (2018, background): “A common experimental bias in network intrusion detection is the base rate fallacy [5]: given the large imbalance between benign and malicious traffic, even FPR = 0.”
- Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Hidden Markov Model (2012, unknown): “Otherwise,duetothe“baseratefallacy”effect[17], bankadministratorsmaytendtoignorethealarms.”
- Anomaly-based network intrusion detection: Techniques, systems and challenges (2009, background): “Some of the most significant challenges in the area are: – Low detection efficiency, especially due to the high false positive rate usually obtained (Axelsson, 2000).”
- Enhancing byte-level network intrusion detection signatures with context (2003, background): “[3] discusse s ome statistical limits, arguing in particular that the false-a larm rate is the limiting factor for the performance of an IDS.”
- Hidden Markov Model (2010, unknown): “Otherwise, due to the “base rate fallacy” effect [17], bank administrators may tend to ignore the alarms.”
- A Probabilistic Discriminative Model for Android Malware Detection with Decompiled Source Code (2015, background): “This probability may not be so meaningful under the situation of imbalanced data, due to the Base Rate Fallacy [31].”
- Combating imbalance in network intrusion datasets (2006, background): “Axelsson [ 7 ] demonstrated that the primary limitation of an intrusion detection system is not the ability to identify behavior as intrusive, rather its effectiveness stems from its abilities to limit false alarms.”