Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation

By B. J. Gersh. 2011

899 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3200da96239f0b561a6253f0bf3fa806574741d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. B. Nørgaard
2. J. Leipsic
3. S. Gaur
4. A. Erglis
5. S. Seneviratne
6. B. Ko
7. Hiroshi Ito
8. J. Jensen

Citations in the corpus

• 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesi (2011, neutral): “80 can also be onsidered “significant” (299,300).”
• Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). (2014, background): “In clinical practice, such patients present a particular challenge because the relationship between angiographic stenosis severity and ischemia is poor (1,13).”