What drives the formation of ‘valuable’ university–industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future (2020, background): “Others suggest that it has limited explanatory power for many practical issues (Brundin, Wigren, Isaacs, Friedrich, & Visser, 2008; Giuliani & Arza, 2009; Tuunainen, 2002), particularly when comparing between different contexts (Balzat & Hanusch, 2004; Cai, 2014; Mowery & Sampat 2004).”
Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit (2012, background): “Structural factors include the firm’s age (Eom and Lee, 2009; Giuliani and Arza, 2009), the firm’s size (Cohen et al., 2002; Santoro and Chakrabarti, 2002; Hanel and St-Pierre, 2006), the sector and industrial environment (Laursen and Salter, 2004; Hanel and St-Pierre, 2006; Segarra-Blasco and…”
Innovation capability building and learning mechanisms in latecomer firms: recent empirical contributions and implications for research (2012, background): “Similarly, Giuliani and Arza (2009) show that among wine firms in both Italy and Chile, the strength of innovation-centered links with universities and public research organisations were greatest for firms with the strongest internal knowledge bases for supporting their own change and innovation.”