Superfluorescence from lead halide perovskite quantum dot superlattices

By G. Rainò, M. Becker, M. Bodnarchuk, R. Mahrt, M. Kovalenko, T. Stöferle. Nature, 2018

632 citations recorded by the source corpus.

An ensemble of emitters can behave very differently from its individual constituents when they interact coherently via a common light field. After excitation of such an ensemble, collective coupling can give rise to a many-body quantum phenomenon that results in short, intense bursts of light—so-called superfluorescence1. Because this phenomenon requires a fine balance of interactions between the emitters and their decoupling from the environment, together with close identity of the individual emitters, superfluorescence has thus far been observed only in a limited number of systems, such as certain atomic and molecular gases and a few solid-state systems2–7. The generation of superfluorescent light in colloidal nanocrystals (which are bright photonic sources practically suited for optoelectronics8,9) has been precluded by inhomogeneous emission broadening, low oscillator strength, and fast exciton dephasing. Here we show that caesium lead halide (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br) perovskite nanocrystals10–13 that are self-organized into highly ordered three-dimensional superlattices exhibit key signatures of superfluorescence. These are dynamically red-shifted emission with more than 20-fold accelerated radiative decay, extension of the first-order coherence time by more than a factor of four, photon bunching, and delayed emission pulses with Burnham–Chiao ringing behaviour14 at high excitation density. These mesoscopically extended coherent states could be used to boost the performance of opto-electronic devices15 and enable entangled multi-photon quantum light sources16,17. Cooperative quantum effects in superlattices of quantum dots made of caesium lead halide perovskite give rise to superfluorescence, with the individual emitters interacting coherently to give intense bursts of light.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2bbf7e0821040e577dc44e9fa49ebf856eedbe2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Edward H. Sargent
  2. D. Talapin
  3. F. P. García de Arquer
  4. V. Klimov
  5. Yasuhiko Arakawa
  6. Manfred Bayer
  7. K. Johnston
  8. Matthew C. Beard

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Edward H. Sargent
  2. D. Talapin
  3. V. Klimov
  4. F. P. García de Arquer
  5. K. Johnston
  6. Matthew C. Beard
  7. Gregory Scholes
  8. M. Kovalenko

Citations in the corpus