Handbook of Income Distribution

By Anthony B. Atkinson, François Bourguignon. 2000

319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2ba5cf85a0a0c0cba353dcdde8a14cebef6326f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Capital account liberalization and income inequality (2016, background): “However, this data set has important deﬁciencies ( Atkinson and Bourguignon, 2000; Atkinson and Brandolini, 2001; Galbraith and Kum, 2005).”
Frictional Wage Dispersion in Search Models: A Quantitative Assessment (2011, unknown): “We point out that in the context of the literature on “ideal” inequality indexes (Cowell, 2000), the Mm ratio has the same properties as quantile ratios, a class of indexes that is routinely used in the empirical inequality literature.”
Macroeconomics and Household Heterogeneity (2016, methodology): “…households, and for households in each of the five quintiles of the net worth distribution, the changes (both percentages and absolute) in net worth, percentage changes in disposable income, and consumption expenditures and change in consumption expenditure rates (in percentage points).13 For…”
The Altruistic Rich? Inequality and Other-Regarding Preferences for Redistribution (2017, methodology): “We directly translate this into an empirical measure, by using state-level Atkinson indexes for each year, denoted Qst (Atkinson 1970; Cowell 2000).”
The Externalities of Inequality: Fear of Crime and Preferences for Redistribution in Western Europe (2016, methodology): “Sample selection effects are taken into account by using an estimator that weights according to a household’s sample inclusion probability (e.g., Cowell 2000).”
Colloquium: Statistical mechanics of money, wealth, and income (2009, methodology): “Interestingly, the study of pairwise money transfer and the resulting statistical distribution of money 3 See, e.g., Atkinson and Bourguignon (2000); Atkinson and Piketty (2007); Champernowne (1953); Champernowne and Cowell (1998); Gibrat (1931); Kakwani (1980); Kalecki (1945); Pareto (1897);…”