Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

By Megan H. Bair-Merritt. Practical Biostatistics, 2009

1,302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstracts of the 6th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Indonesian Heart Rhythm Society Jakarta, 21-22 September 2018 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Subfields: General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d29b44009cee90487bc96c8bf7bd1370189e26b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Debbie Rankin
2. Mikel Hernandez
3. Rodrigo Cilla
4. Gorka Epelde
5. Ane Alberdi

In Statistics and Probability

1. Debbie Rankin
2. Mikel Hernandez
3. Rodrigo Cilla
4. Gorka Epelde
5. Ane Alberdi

Citations in the corpus

• Synthetic data generation for tabular health records: A systematic review (2022, methodology): “To conduct the systematic review we have defined a six-step methodology, starting from the proposals made by Khan et al [32] and Uman [33].”
• Cover Crop for Early Season Weed Suppression in Crops: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (2018, neutral): “Sci. 18:187–196. doi:10.1626/pps.18.187 Uman, L.S. 2011.”
• A systematic review on digital literacy (2022, background): “As Uman (2011) pointed, in systematic literature review, the findings of the earlier research are examined for the identification of consistent and repetitive themes.”