Saproxylic Beetles in Standing Dead Wood Density in Relation to Substrate Sun-exposure and Diameter

By Anders Lindhe, Å. Lindelöw, N. Åsenblad. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2005

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d28f7e8bb393cebdba3396141072dd75d8091196

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Hilszczański
2. P. Duelli
3. L. Čížek
4. Štěpán Vodka
5. J. Benes
6. Martin K. Obrist
7. B. Wermelinger
8. J. Weslien

In Insect Science

1. Štěpán Vodka
2. L. Čížek
3. Martin Schroeder
4. J. Hilszczański
5. M. Konvička
6. J. Weslien
7. M. Jonsell
8. P. Duelli

In Plant Science

1. Martin Schroeder
2. Štěpán Vodka
3. L. Čížek
4. J. Weslien
5. M. Jonsell
6. M. Konvička
7. J. Hilszczański
8. T. Ranius

Citations in the corpus

• Deadwood enrichment in European forests – Which tree species should be used to promote saproxylic beetle diversity? (2016, unknown): “(Micro-)Climaticvariables,suchastemperature (e.g. sun-exposed vs. shaded substrates), in fl uence the development of insect species and may affect their diversity (Gough et al., 2015; Lindhe and Lindelöw, 2004; Lindhe et al., 2005; Müller et al., 2015a; Sverdrup-Thygeson and Ims, 2002).”
• Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities (2008, background): “…(Peterken and Francis, 1999; Strandberg et al., 2005), butterflies (Warren, 1991; Bergman and Kindvall, 2004; Freese et al., 2006), orthoptera (Theuerkauf and Rouys, 2006), saproxylic beetles (Ranius and Jansson, 2000; Lindhe et al., 2005), and birds (Fuller and Henderson, 1992; Hansson, 2001).”
• Variable response of different functional groups of saproxylic beetles to substrate manipulation and forest management: Implications for conservation strategies (2007, background): “(Araya, 1993; Andersson, 2001; Lindhe et al., 2005).”
• Saproxylic beetles in high stumps of spruce: Fungal flora important for determining the species composition (2005, result): “In general, wood of large diameter is regarded to be richer in saproxylic species than thinner wood (Grove, 2002), but this has, at most, been verified only vaguely in this study or other investigations of high stumps (Jonsell et al., 2004; Lindhe et al., 2005).”
• Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management (2009, background): “The earlier studies based on rearing sampled understorey, and mostly originated from northern range edges of oak woodlands (Kappes and Topp 2004; Lindhe and Lindelöw 2004; Lindhe et al. 2005).”
• What window traps can tell us: effect of placement, forest openness and beetle reproduction in retention trees (2009, unknown): “The number of aspen associates in the trunk-window traps was higher in the open clear-cuts than in closed forest, maybe because several of the aspen associates prefer sunny locations for breeding (Ehnström and Axelsson 2002; Lindhe et al. 2005).”
• Biodiversity of most dead wood-dependent organisms in thermophilic temperate oak woodlands thrives on diversity of open landscape structures (2014, background): “A similar situation is observed in studies at guild or family levels, where most taxa thrive on canopy openness (Lindhe et al., 2005; Horak and Rebl, 2013).”
• Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges (2007, background): “Jonsell et al. 1998; Lindhe et al. 2005 ), especially buprestids.”
• Increased openness around retained oaks increases species richness of saproxylic beetles (2012, background): “Studies have shown that beetle species dependent on high levels of insolation are often associated with shade-intolerant tree species (Jonsell et al. 1998; Lindhe et al. 2005).”