Microbial response to rhizodeposition depending on water regimes in paddy soils

By Jing Tian, M. Dippold, J. Pausch, E. Blagodatskaya, M. Fan, Xiaolin Li, Y. Kuzyakov. 2013

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Rhizodeposit-carbon (rhizo-C) serves as a primary energy and C source for microorganisms in the rhizosphere. Despite important progress in understanding the fate of rhizo-C in upland soils, little is known about microbial community dynamics associated with rhizo-C in flooded soils, especially depending on water regimes in rice systems. In this study, rice grown under non-flooded, continuously flooded and alternating water regimes was pulse labeled with 13 CO 2 and the incorporation of rhizo-C into specific microbial groups was determined by 13 C in phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) at day 2 and 14 after the labeling. A decreased C released from roots under continuously flooded condition was accompanied with lower total 13 C incorporation into microorganisms compared to the non-flooded and alternating water regimes treatments. Continuous flooding caused a relative increase of 13 C incorporation in Gram positive bacteria (i14:0, i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, i17:0, a17:0). In contrast, Gram negative bacteria (16:1ω7c, 18:1ω7c, cy17:0, cy 19:0) and fungi (18:2ω6, 9c, 18:1ω9c) showed greater rhizo-C incorporation coupled with a higher turnover under non-flooded and alternating water regimes treatments. These observations suggest that microbial groups processing rhizo-C differed among rice systems with varying water regimes. In contrast to non-flooded and alternating water regimes, there was little to no temporal 13 C change in most microbial groups under continuous flooding condition between day 2 and 14 after the labeling, which may demonstrate slower microbial processing turnover. In summary, our findings indicate that belowground C input by rhizodeposition and its biological cycling was significantly influenced by water regimes in rice systems.

Subfields: Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d27f0faff10116ad757c40ee9d617cc22a7c34d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

  1. Y. Kuzyakov
  2. E. Blagodatskaya
  3. A. Gunina
  4. M. Dippold
  5. B. Glaser
  6. J. Pausch
  7. B. Razavi
  8. W. Cheng

In Soil Science

  1. Y. Kuzyakov
  2. A. Gunina
  3. E. Blagodatskaya
  4. M. Dippold
  5. B. Glaser
  6. J. Pausch
  7. B. Razavi
  8. W. Cheng

Citations in the corpus