Galaxy bimodality versus stellar mass and environment

By I. Baldry, M. Balogh, Richard G. Bower, Karl Glazebrook, Robert Nichol, Steven Bamford, Tamás Budavári. 2006

665 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We analyse a z < 0.1 galaxy sample from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey focusing on the variation in the galaxy colour bimodality with stellar mass M and projected neighbour density Σ, and on measurements of the galaxy stellar mass functions. The characteristic mass increases with environmental density from about 10 10. 6 to 10 10.9 M ⊙ (Kroupa initial mass function, H 0 = 70) for Σ in the range 0.1-10 Mpc -2 . The galaxy population naturally divides into a red and blue sequence with the locus of the sequences in colour-mass and colour-concentration indices not varying strongly with environment. The fraction of galaxies on the red sequence is determined in bins of 0.2 in log Σ and log M (12 x 13 bins). The red fraction f r generally increases continuously in both Σ and M such that there is a unified relation: f, = F(Σ, M). Two simple functions are proposed which provide good fits to the data. These data are compared with analogous quantities in semi-analytical models based on the Millennium N-body simulation: the Bower et al. and Croton et al. models that incorporate active galactic nucleus feedback. Both models predict a strong dependence of the red fraction on stellar mass and environment that is qualitatively similar to the observations. However, a quantitative comparison shows that the Bower et al. model is a significantly better match; this appears to be due to the different treatment of feedback in central galaxies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2520ec368768b3d0a7bb10c769f65a9c432768e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Volker Springel
  4. R. Somerville
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. C. Conroy
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

In Instrumentation

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. C. Conroy
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. Volker Springel
  6. R. Somerville
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. P. V. van Dokkum

Citations in the corpus