Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency

By Steven Van Passel, F. Nevens, E. Mathijs, G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2007

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Chemistry, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d24439b82f017ab3538caae069c72a95fab8962b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. A. Wossink
2. I. D. de Boer
3. Lee-Ann Sutherland
4. L. Zagata
5. O. Sydorovych

In Environmental Chemistry

1. A. Wossink
2. Lee-Ann Sutherland
3. L. Zagata
4. O. Sydorovych

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. A. Wossink
2. O. Sydorovych

Citations in the corpus

• THE MEANING OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY: EVIDENCE FROM A CONJOINT CHOICE SURVEY (2008, background): “Indicators are used individually, as part of a set, or in the form of an aggregate index simultaneously considering all three dimensions (ecological, social and economic) for a holistic sustainability assessment (Van Passel et al., 2007).”
• Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms (2009, background): “Preferably, however, more than one domain of sustainability should be addressed (Glavič and Lukman, 2007; Ness et al., 2007; Van Passel et al., 2007).”
• Deconstructing the ‘young farmer problem in Europe’: Towards a research agenda (2015, background): “…relates to views on sustainability (Comer et al., 1999; Vanslembrouck et al., 2002), orientation towards sustainable and efficient agriculture (van Passel et al., 2007; Lobley et al., 2009), up-take of organic farming (Laepple and Van Rensburg, 2011) and impacts on the welfare of animals kept on…”