Policy transfer via modularity and reward guiding
By Ignasi Clavera, David Held, Pieter Abbeel. 2017
41 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Yoshua Bengio
- Vladlen Koltun
- Chelsea Finn
- Trevor Darrell
- Yuxi Li
- David Silver
In Biomedical Engineering
- Vladlen Koltun
- David Silver
- Tom Schaul
- Alexey Dosovitskiy
- Bernard Ghanem
- Daniel Jaymin Mankowitz
- Philip H. S. Torr
- Alan L. Yuille
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Vladlen Koltun
- Sergey Levine
- Matthias Müller
- Bernard Ghanem
- Alexey Dosovitskiy
- Daniel Jaymin Mankowitz
- R´emi Munos
- Tom Schaul
Citations in the corpus
- Driving Policy Transfer via Modularity and Abstraction (2018, background): “irect sim-to-real generalization by maximizing the diversity of textures and occluders in simulation. Other approaches tackle transfer via modularization in the context of manual grasping and pushing [10,7]. Clavera et al. [7] propose an approach that is conceptually similar to ours in that a system”
- Modular Networks: Learning to Decompose Neural Computation (2018, background): “There is also a wide range of literature in robotics that uses modularity to learn robot skills more efficiently by reusing functionality shared between tasks [19, 6].”
- DREAM Architecture: a Developmental Approach to Open-Ended Learning in Robotics (2020, unknown): “Transfer learning is also particularly interesting to learn in simulation before transferring to reality, as it drastically reduces the number of required samples on the real robot [16, 17, 18, 19, 20].”
- Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning Using Successor Features and Generalised Policy Improvement (2018, background): “Many works on the combination of deep RL and transfer propose modular network architectures that naturally induce a decomposition of the problem (Devin et al., 2016; Heess et al., 2017; Clavera et al., 2017).”