IMPACT OF NEST‐SITE SELECTION ON NEST SUCCESS AND NEST TEMPERATURE IN NATURAL AND DISTURBED HABITATS

By J. Kolbe, F. Janzen. 2002

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d21338cf954a76b2d334d667900696425cd99602

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Nest-site preference and maternal effects on offspring growth (2004, background): “Although some studies support the preference-performance hypothesis (Fox et al., 1994; Kolbe and Janzen, 2002; Qualls and Shine, 1998; Shine and Harlow, 1996), in many other cases juvenile performance is lower or unchanged at preferred sites compared to nonpreferred sites (e.”
Effects of landscape composition, habitat features, and nest distribution on predation rates of simulated turtle nests (2004, background): “To ensure maximum recruitment into populations of turtles, nesting habitat should be managed to incorporate habitat preferences of turtles (Wilson, 1998; Kolbe and Janzen, 2002), maximize embryonic survival (Cagle et al.”
Predicting organismal vulnerability to climate warming: roles of behaviour, physiology and adaptation (2012, background): “For example, a female can control the thermal conditions her eggs will experience simply by altering the depth of her nest or its shading [127,161,168,169], by changing season of laying [170,171] or by using buffered microhabitats such as termite mounds [172] or transpiring leaves [166].”
Terrestrial habitat requirements of nesting freshwater turtles (2012, background): “When applying the distances reported here to protected zones, it is essential to ensure the presence of nesting habitat and consider potential edge effects (Kolbe and Janzen, 2002a, b).”
Geographic variation in the pattern of temperature-dependent sex determination in the American snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) (2005, unknown): “While our evaluation was less quantitative than some current methods (e.g. Kolbe & Janzen, 2002), it was regarded as sufficient to represent our regional focal groups given the often rapid phenological changes in the herbaceous components of the vegetation that shaded the nests.”
Assessments of habitat preferences and quality depend on spatial scale and metrics of fitness (2007, result): “…2000; Jones 2001) and, when they are, many results suggest neutral or even inverse relationships between preferred habitats and indices of fitness across a wide variety of taxa (Thompson 1988; Valladares & Lawton 1991; Misenhelter & Rotenberry 2000; Kolbe & Janzen 2002; but see Martin 1998).”
Ecological traps in isodars: effects of tallgrass prairie management on bird nest success (2005, result): “Our results, together with those of other studies, (Best 1986, Misenhelter and Rotenberry 2000, Kolbe and Janzen 2002, Remes 2003), indicate that ecological traps are especially common in managed and altered ecosystems.”