Pufferfish
By Daniel Kifer, Ashwin Machanavajjhala. 2014
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Privacy & Security
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Ashwin Machanavajjhala
- Kamalika Chaudhuri
- Daniel Kifer
- Shuang Song
- Prateek Mittal
- Michael Hay
- Supriyo Chakraborty
- Changchang Liu
In Sociology and Political Science
- Kamalika Chaudhuri
- Ashwin Machanavajjhala
- Daniel Kifer
- Shuang Song
- Prateek Mittal
- Yizhen Wang
- Michael Hay
- Rashidul Islam
In Privacy & Security
- Kamalika Chaudhuri
- Shuang Song
- Ashwin Machanavajjhala
- Michael Hay
- Prateek Mittal
- Daniel Kifer
- Supriyo Chakraborty
- Changchang Liu
Citations in the corpus
- Privacy in Deep Learning: A Survey (2020, background): “A generalized version of differential privacy called Pufferfish was proposed by [62].”
- Differential Privacy in the Wild: A Tutorial on Current Practices & Open Challenges (2016, background): “We will discuss the No Free Lunch Theorem in data privacy [25], and present alternate privacy definitions that can be customized to match the structure of the data [16, 21, 26].”
- Revisiting Differentially Private Hypothesis Tests for Categorical Data (2015, background): “For additional interpretations of the privacy guarantees of differential privacy and suggestions for setting the privacy parameter , see Dwork (2006), Kifer and Machanavajjhala (2014) and Machanavajjhala and Kifer (2015).”
- Pufferfish Privacy Mechanisms for Correlated Data (2016, background): “The privacy framework of our choice is Pufferfish [20], an elegant generalization of differential privacy [8].”
- Enabling Privacy-Preserving GWAS in Heterogeneous Human Populations (2016, unknown): “…one coordinate, and for all sets S 3 U, we have PðFðD; yÞ˛SÞ%expðEÞPðFðD; y0Þ˛SÞ: This definition of privacy can be viewed as a specific instantiation of both induced differential privacy (Kifer andMachanavajjhala, 2011) and the Blowfish framework (Kifer and Machanavajjhala, 2014; Hi et al., 2014).”
- DEEProtect: Enabling Inference-based Access Control on Mobile Sensing Applications (2017, background): “4 in [44]) and Blowfish privacy (Definition 4.”
- Privacy-preserving Analysis of Correlated Data (2016, methodology): “However, while a number of Pufferfish mechanisms for specific frameworks are known (Kifer and Machanavajjhala, 2014; He et al., 2014), there is no generic mechanism that applies to any Pufferfish framework.”
- Correlated Differential Privacy: Hiding Information in Non-IID Data Set (2015, background): “The Exponential mechanism is formally defined as [8]: Definition 4 (Exponential Mechanism): An Exponential mechanism M is -differential privacy if: M(D) = {return ψ with the probability ∝ exp( Q(D, ψ) 2GS )}, C. Related Work 1) Correlated Differential Privacy: In the past decade, a growing body of…”
- Bayesian Modeling of Intersectional Fairness: The Variance of Bias (2018, methodology): “We use the notation of [19] for all definitions we consider.”
- LightDP: towards automating differential privacy proofs (2016, background): “…answer queries, and build statistical models satisfy differential privacy (Dwork et al. 2006b) — a set of restrictions on their probabilistic behavior that provably limit the ability of attackers to infer individual-level sensitive information (Dwork et al. 2006b; Kifer and Machanavajjhala 2014).”