Relative competitive performance of 63 species of terrestrial herbaceous plants
By Paul A. Keddy, K. Nielsen, E. Weiher, R. Lawson. 2002
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1ed30a0dbbcbda396c8451b82f64d5285b01efd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Plant strategies and trait trade‐offs influence trends in competitive ability along gradients of soil fertility and disturbance (2005, background): “Despite much examination of trends in competition intensity and in the competitive ability of different species along fertility gradients (Campbell & Grime 1992; Wedin & Tilman 1993; Wilson & Tilman 1993; Gaudet & Keddy 1995; Twolan-Strutt & Keddy 1996; Cahill 1999; Keddy et al . 2002; Rajaniemi 2”
- SESAM – a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio‐temporal patterns of species assemblages (2011, background): “…need to be complemented with novel data from well-designed field surveys and from experiments (e.g. to measure species’ relative competitive ability; Keddy et al., 2002) with eco-physiological measurements (e.g. to better assess the fundamental response of species along environmental gradients in…”
- Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants (2008, background): “…in resource availability and disturbance (e.g. Rice and Menke, 1985; Wilson and Tilman, 1995; Suding and Goldberg, 2001), while larger comparative studies have generally found that hierarchies are relatively stable between environments (Rösch et al., 1997a; Keddy et al., 1994, 1998, 2000, 2002).”
- Warming changes plant competitive hierarchy in a temperate steppe in northern China (2008, background): “Both dependence (Austin et al. 1985; Tilman 1990) and independence (Fowler 1982; Keddy et al. 2000, 2002) on the environment of species competitive hierarchy have been reported previously.”
- TRY – a global database of plant traits (2011, background): “This central assumption of plant comparative ecology implies that, while there is variation within species, this variation is smaller than the differences between species (Garnier et al., 2001; Keddy et al., 2002; Westoby et al., 2002; Shipley, 2007).”
- Agronomic aspects of strip intercropping lettuce with alyssum for biological control of aphids (2013, background): “Previous studies found that shoot biomass is a good predictor of competitive ability (Gaudet and Keddy, 1988; Keddy et al., 2002 ).”
- Dispersion of traits related to competitive ability in an old‐field plant community (2007, background): “Plant species size has been repeatedly implicated as an important determinant of competitive ability (Goldberg 1987; Gaudet & Keddy 1988; Keddy & Shipley 1989; Goldberg & Landa 1991; Rosch et al . 1997; Freckleton & Watkinson 2001; Howard & Goldberg 2001; Keddy et al . 2002; Warren et al . 2002; F”
- Determinants of community organization of a South African mesic grassland (2005, background): “1), in accordance with observations that narrow-leaved species become relatively more competitive when nutrients are limiting (Keddy et al. 2002).”
- Are competitive effect and response two sides of the same coin, or fundamentally different? (2010, background): “One possible explanation for the consistency of these prior findings is that most comparative studies of plant competition have been conducted under high nutrient conditions, where root competition is likely of limited importance (Gaudet & Keddy 1988; Keddy, Fraser &Wisheu 1998; Keddy et al. 2002).”