The finite element method and its reliability
By Ivo Babuska, Theofanis Strouboulis. 2001
847 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1e00887d2be9ebf1e3f070cb6c2c42664b75cc9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- L. Beirão da Veiga
- Annalisa Buffa
- Mary F. Wheeler
- Dominik Schillinger
- Chi-Wang Shu
- Dae-Jin Kim
- Alexander Düster
- J. Pereira
Citations in the corpus
- A New Finite Element Gradient Recovery Method: Superconvergence Property (2005, background): “In the literature, we know that the tangential derivative of the finite element solution is superconvergent at two Gaussian points along the element edge for certain uniform mesh patterns [2] [3] [17].”
- A posteriori error estimation and dynamic adaptivity for symmetric discontinuous Galerkin approximations of reactive transport problems (2006, methodology): “A posteriori error estimators can be used to signify where modifications in discretization parameters need to be made, thus achieving adaptivity, in particular, goal-oriented hp-adaptivity [31,39,20,8,5–7,19,21–23,26,32,35,38,40,44,27,18,4,2,3], see also [57,9,13] and references therein.”
- The p-Version of the Finite Element and Finite Cell Methods (2017, background): “The definitive properties of bilinear forms and linear functionals are listed, for example, in Szabó and Babuška (1991), Schwab (1998), and Babuška and Strouboulis (2001). The definitions for (u, v), (v), X, and Y depend on the choice of the generalized formulation and the boundary conditions.”
- Functional a posteriori estimates for the reaction–diffusion problem (2006, background): “We omit here a detailed review of the literature but refer to the monographs [1,4,8] and the references therein.”
- A Stochastic Collocation Method for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations with Random Input Data (2007, methodology): “Some sources of errors arising in computer simulations now can be controlled and reduced by using sophisticated techniques such as a posteriori error estimation [1, 3, 57], mesh adaptivity, and the more recent modeling error analysis [49, 50, 13].”
- Finite Element Methods (2000, methodology): “Details on the implementation are given in Ainsworth and Oden (2000); a detailed error analysis with higher-order equilibrations and the perturbation by a finite element simulation of the local problems with corrections can be found in Ainsworth and Oden (2000) and Babuška and Strouboulis (2001).”
- AN A POSTERIORI ERROR ANALYSIS OF ADAPTIVE FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR DISTRIBUTED ELLIPTIC CONTROL PROBLEMS WITH CONTROL CONSTRAINTS (2008, background): “, the monographs [1,3,4,14,26,27] and the references therein).”
- Reduced Basis Approximation and A Posteriori Error Estimation for Parametrized Partial Differential Equations (2007, background): “There is, thus, even greater need for a posteriori error estimation in the RB context than in the much more studied FE context [4, 5, 12, 11, 13, 22].”
- Discontinuous Galerkin methods for reactive transport in porous media (2003, methodology): “A posteriori error estimators can be used to signify where modifications in discretization parameters need to be made and thus to achieve adaptivity, in particular the goal-oriented hp-adaptivity [1– 4, 21, 28–30, 32–34, 51, 58, 61, 64, 67–69, 86], see also [5, 12, 96] and references therein.”
- Some remarks on the history and future of averaging techniques in a posteriori finite element error analysis (2004, methodology): “Details on the implementation can be found in [1], a related correction technique in [6].”
- Estimation of interpolation error constants for the P0 and P1 triangular finite elements (2007, methodology): “Thus such an evaluation has become progressively more important and has been attempted especially for adaptive finite element calculations based on a posteriori error estimation as well as for numerical verification by FEM [1,4,6,7,13].”
- THE POLYNOMIAL-PRESERVING RECOVERY FOR HIGHER ORDER FINITE ELEMENT METHODS IN 2D AND 3D (2005, background): “For the history and the advances in this field, the reader is referred to [1, 5, 8, 15, 23].”