Post-copy live migration of virtual machines

By Michael R. Hines, Umesh Deshpande, Kartik Gopalan. OPSR, 2009

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1d0eea70fa101e2d3e0feecfd4cf0aafab5c89e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Abdullah Bin Gani
2. Rongxing Lu
3. Zheng Yan
4. Shuo Chen
5. Abdullah Yousafzai
6. Mqhele E. Dlodlo
7. Opeyemi A. Osanaiye
8. Muhammad Shiraz

In Hardware and Architecture

1. Abdullah Bin Gani

In Information Systems

1. Abdullah Bin Gani
2. Rongxing Lu
3. Zheng Yan
4. Abdullah Yousafzai
5. Muhammad Shiraz
6. Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo
7. Siti Hafizah Ab Hamid
8. Raja Wasim Ahmad

Citations in the corpus

• From Cloud to Fog Computing: A Review and a Conceptual Live VM Migration Framework (2017, background): “Post-copy live migration has also been proposed in [82], which stops the VM at the initial stage in order to transfer the vCPU state and device to the target host.”
• A survey on virtual machine migration and server consolidation frameworks for cloud data centers (2015, methodology): “DBAL(Hines et al., 2009) | N Self-ballooning, compression | | CPU N/A”
• Survey (2016, neutral): “In VM LM, two main approaches have been proposed for memory synchronization between the active VM in the source physical host and the passive VM in the destination host: precopy [Clark et al. 2005] and postcopy [Hines et al. 2009].”