Towards Bounding-Box Free Panoptic Segmentation
By Ujwal D. Bonde, Pablo Fernández Alcantarilla, Stefan Leutenegger. 2020
11 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this work we introduce a new Bounding-Box Free Network (BBFNet) for panoptic segmentation. Panoptic segmentation is an ideal problem for proposal-free methods as it already requires per-pixel semantic class labels. We use this observation to exploit class boundaries from off-the-shelf semantic segmentation networks and refine them to predict instance labels. Towards this goal BBFNet predicts coarse watershed levels and uses them to detect large instance candidates where boundaries are well defined. For smaller instances, whose boundaries are less reliable, BBFNet also predicts instance centers by means of Hough voting followed by mean-shift to reliably detect small objects. A novel triplet loss network helps merging fragmented instances while refining boundary pixels. Our approach is distinct from previous works in panoptic segmentation that rely on a combination of a semantic segmentation network with a computationally costly instance segmentation network based on bounding box proposals, such as Mask R-CNN, to guide the prediction of instance labels using a Mixture-of-Expert (MoE) approach. We benchmark our proposal-free method on Cityscapes and Microsoft COCO datasets and show competitive performance with other MoE based approaches while outperforming existing non-proposal based methods on the COCO dataset. We show the flexibility of our method using different semantic segmentation backbones and provide video results on challenging scenes in the wild in the supplementary material. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this chapter (10.1007/978-3-030-71278-5_23) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ocean Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Alan L. Yuille
- Liang-Chieh Chen
- Luc Van Gool
- Huiyu Wang
- Dacheng Tao
- Xiaogang Wang
- Siyuan Qiao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
In Ocean Engineering
- Alan L. Yuille
- Yukun Zhu
- Siyuan Qiao
- Hartwig Adam
- Liang-Chieh Chen
- Huiyu Wang
- Andrew Zisserman
- Manik Varma
Citations in the corpus
- Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic Segmentation (2020, methodology): “BBFNet [7] obtains instance segmentation results by Watershed transform [79,4] and Hough-voting [5,47].”
- MaX-DeepLab: End-to-End Panoptic Segmentation with Mask Transformers (2020, methodology): “Then, instance segments are obtained by grouping ‘thing’ pixels with various methods, such as instance center regression [44, 86, 70, 100, 20], Watershed transform [88, 3, 8], Hough-voting [4, 53, 8], or pixel affinity [45, 66, 81, 30, 8].”
- CMT-DeepLab: Clustering Mask Transformers for Panoptic Segmentation (2022, methodology): “Other proxy-based methods typically start with semantic segments [11,13,16] and group ‘thing’ pixels into instance segments with various proxy tasks, such as instance center regression [19,42,56,67,79,83,90], Watershed transform [4, 8, 81], Hough-voting [5, 8, 51], or pixel affinity [8, 29, 43, 61, ”