Effect of drought on the growth of Lolium perenne genotypes with and without fungal endophytes

By G. P. Cheplick, Ana Perera, K. Koulouris. 2000

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Environmental Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1bdcc394336973726ea1c8ff213335dc3e65799

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Environmental Chemistry

Citations in the corpus

Evolutionary Origins and Ecological Consequences of Endophyte Symbiosis with Grasses (2002, background): “Enhanced drought tolerance is a well-known benefit of endophyte infection in tall fescue and perennial ryegrass (Arechavaleta et al. 1989; Bouton et al. 1993; Lewis et al. 1997; Malinowski et al. 1997a; but see Cheplick et al. 2000).”
Perennial ryegrass breeding in New Zealand: a dairy industry perspective (2012, background): “2007), and their ability to recover from water deficit stress (i.e. maintenance of live leaf area and tiller survival following drought; Cheplick et al. 2000).”
Are endophytic fungi defensive plant mutualists (2002, background): “Likewise, infection by Neotyphodium did not increase performance of agronomic perennial ryegrass in different environments; instead plant genotype determined performance (Cheplick et al. 2000).”
Insect-Fungal Associations: Ecology and Evolution (2005, background): “More recently, compelling research assessing interactions between grass endophytes and their hosts has led to a general expectation that endophytes compensate plants for the cost of infection by serving as defensive mutualists that confer protection against biotic and abiotic stressors (Clay 1990; H”
Recent Molecular and Genomic Studies on Stress Tolerance of Forage and Turf Grasses (2006, background): “, 1989), water relations (Cheplick et al., 2000), and drought recovery (Morse et al.”
Ecological importance of Neotyphodium spp. grass endophytes in agroecosystems (2006, background): “In contrast, stomatal functions do not seem to be affected by infection with N. lolii in perennial ryegrass, and there are either inconsistent or negligible effects for both physiological (Barker et al., 1997; Amalric et al., 1999) and morphological traits (Cheplick et al., 2000; Lewis, 2000a).”
Asexual Neotyphodium endophytes in a native grass reduce competitive abilities (2004, background): “…the costs and benefits of harbouring endophytes change among different environments (Faeth 2002; Faeth & Bultman 2002) as has been shown for some domesticated grasses (e.g. Clay et al. 1993; Cheplick et al. 2000) and with different plant and endophyte genotypes (e.g. Meijer & Leuchtmann 2001).”