Music21: A Toolkit for Computer-Aided Musicology and Symbolic Music Data
By M. Cuthbert, C. Ariza. International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, 2010
487 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1bacc1a26df8a3f78c78ba39193eac398c590de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jesse Engel
- Adam Roberts
- Curtis Hawthorne
- Ian Simon
- Colin Raffel
- Yu-Siang Huang
- Yoshua Bengio
- Mohit Bansal
Citations in the corpus
- Onsets and Frames: Dual-Objective Piano Transcription (2017, background): “Making a larger collection of symbolic music available also broadens the scope of possible computational musicology studies [8].”
- DeepBach: a Steerable Model for Bach Chorales Generation (2016, methodology): “s local context. 2.4 Implementation Details We implemented DeepBach using Keras [9] with the Tensor ow [1] backend. We used the database of chorale harmonizations by J.S. Bach included in the music21 [11] toolkit. After removing chorales with instrumental parts and chorales containing parts with two”
- Artsheets for Art Datasets (2021, background): “Under a broader historical lens, the JS Fake Chorales dataset reiterates environmental, sociopolitical, and professional factors that shaped Music21 toolkit [81].”
- Learning-Based Methods for Comparing Sequences, with Applications to Audio-to-MIDI Alignment and Matching (2016, background): “Both music21 (Cuthbert and Ariza, 2010) and melisma (Sleator and Temperley, 2001) include functionality for estimating chord sequences from symbolic data.”