An Introduction to Reinforcement Learning
By Stephen W. Carden. 2013
2,342 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Shimon Whiteson
- Lihong Li
- Ofir Nachum
- Doina Precup
- Marc G. Bellemare
- Emma Brunskill
Citations in the corpus
- Investigating Contingency Awareness Using Atari 2600 Games (2012, methodology): “An -greedy policy (Sutton and Barto 1998) is used, which takes exploratory actions with probability , and otherwise chooses the action estimated to have highest value.”
- Counterfactual reasoning and learning systems: the example of computational advertising (2012, methodology): “In particular, the work presented in this section is closely related to the Monte-Carlo approach of reinforcement learning (Sutton and Barto, 1998, chapter 5) and to the offline evaluation of contextual bandit policies (Li et al., 2010, 2011).”
- Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning (2016, methodology): “We assume that the reader is familiar with reinforcement learning (Sutton & Barto, 1998) and adopt notational standard MDPNv1 for Markov decision processes (Thomas, 2015a, MDPs).”
- Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives (2020, methodology): “C) Depicts the backward view of RL where we leverage recent states and rewards to correct our evaluations of past states (from (Sutton and Barto, 1998)).”
- Generalized Emphatic Temporal Difference Learning: Bias-Variance Analysis (2015, methodology): “Indeed, for the TD(0) algorithm (Sutton and Barto, 1998; corresponding to the β = 0 case in our setting), a similar representation as a projected Bellman operator holds, but it may be shown that in the off-policy setting the algorithm might diverge (Baird 1995).”
- Linear Off-Policy Actor-Critic (2012, methodology): “For an appropriate step size αu,t (so that the update to πu′ increases the objective with the action-value function Qπu,γ , fixed as the old action-value function), we can guarantee that Jγ(u) = ∑ s∈S db(s) ∑ a∈A πu(a|s)Qπu,γ(s, a) ≤ ∑ s∈S db(s) ∑ a∈A πu′(a|s)Qπu,γ(s, a) Now we can proceed similarly”
- What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Study (2020, methodology): “For the case “advantage_estimator (C6) = N-step”, we further sampled the sub-choices: * N-step N (C7): {1, 3, 10, 1000000} –”