Variability in abundances of fishes associated with seagrass habitats in relation to diets of predatory fishes

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spatial and temporal variability in the assemblage structure of fishes associated with mangroves (Avicennia marina) and intertidal mudflats in temperate Australian embayments (2004, background): “These species are commonly observed in the stomachs of larger predatory fishes (Edgar and Shaw 1995b; Hindell et al. 2000 ), and given the greater structural complexity of mangroves versus mudflats, our patterns are not inconsistent with a model of reduced predation via the provision of a structura”
Linking fish and prawns to their environment: a hierarchical landscape approach (2004, background): “Species preference for seagrasses with the longest leaves (and largest surface area) probably relates to quality of both refuge and food (Orth 1992, Attrill et al. 2000, Hindell et al. 2000).”
The role of seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, salt marshes and reed beds as nursery areas and food sources for fishes in estuaries (2017, background): “Submerged and emergent estuarine macrophyte habitats have often been quoted as offering good protection from predation for small fishes (e.g. Boesch and Turner 1984; Hindell et al. 2000; Laegdsgaard and Johnson 2001).”
Edge effects in patchy seagrass landscapes: The role of predation in determining fish distribution (2011, background): “Australian salmonwere the predominant predator of tethered King George whiting and pipefish and is a common predator of many small fish in seagrass (Robertson, 1982; Hindell et al., 2000).”