Degradation of chemical alarm cues under natural conditions: risk assessment by larval woodfrogs

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The paradox of risk allocation: a review and prospectus (2009, unknown): “Chemicals used to create different risk environments decay over time, consequently decreasing the level of perceived risk (Ferrari et al. 2007c).”
Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. (2010, unknown): “Could associative learning with alarm cues allow prey to recognize not one, but several species of predators? Ferrari et al. (2007c) investigated this aspect of learning by conditioning predator-naı̈ve fathead minnows to recognize the odour of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush (Walbaum in Artedi, 179”
Temporal variability, threat sensitivity and conflicting information about the nature of risk: understanding the dynamics of tadpole antipredator behaviour (2009, unknown): “We used a well-established behavioural protocol to quantify the antipredator responses of the tadpoles (Ferrari et al. 2007b; Ferrari & Chivers 2008).”
Threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition by larval amphibians (2009, background): “While these studies investigated the generalization of predator recognition based on visual cues, Ferrari et al. (2007a) provided evidence that the same phenomenon occurred for prey using chemosensory cues to recognize predators.”