Principles of Abrasive Water Jet Machining

By A. Momber, Radovan Kovacevic. 2012

435 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Ecological Modeling

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1792f6940718a75daee55ae562c588cfca194cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Pradeep Kumar
2. Nikolaos M. Vaxevanidis
3. John (Ioannis) D. Kechagias
4. George P. Petropoulos
5. Natarajan Yuvaraj

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Amaia Alberdi
2. Pradeep Kumar
3. Natarajan Yuvaraj

In Ecological Modeling

1. Amaia Alberdi
2. Pradeep Kumar
3. Natarajan Yuvaraj
4. A. Rivero

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison Metal Water Jet Cutting with Laser and Plasma Cutting (2014, neutral): “[1] Typical water jet cutting machines have a working space from few square feet to hundreds of square feet.”
• Effect of process parameter on the kerf geometry in abrasive water jet milling (2010, background): “According to Momber and Kovacevic [15], the kinetic energy of an abrasive particle after mixing is given by:”
• Multiresponse Optimization of Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process Parameters Using TOPSIS Approach (2015, methodology): “Lower SOD produced a narrow abrasive water jet diameter resulting in reduced kerf width [33] while increased AFR, along with higher P and lower TR, resulted in enhanced quality of the machined surface due to the additional particles created which serve to smoothen the workpiece surface [2].”
• Application of Taguchi design for quality characterization of abrasive water jet machining of TRIP sheet steels (2012, background): “AWJM is widely used in the processing of materials such as titanium, steel, brass, aluminum, stone, Inconel, and any kind of glass and composites [1–4].”