A comparison of clustering methods for river benthic community analysis
By Yong Cao, Bark, W. P. Williams. Hydrobiologia, 2004
58 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Statistics and Probability, Water Science and Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d17915294f2f6efdc5f59370a517f81bf4e26f16
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
In Statistics and Probability
In Water Science and Technology
Citations in the corpus
- Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity (2009, unknown): “TWINSPAN performed well in several comparisons of classification techniques (Gauch & Whittaker 1981; Cao et al. 1997; Moss et al. 1999), although substantial criticisms have also been raised (van Groenewoud 1992; Belbin & McDonald 1993; Dufrêne & Legendre 1997).”
- Using geometric and non-geometric internal evaluators to compare eight vegetation classification methods (2008, methodology): “We made the substitution to be as be consistent as possible with other methods, and based on the demonstration that Ward’s method is often successful when used with non-Euclidean (dis)similarity measures (Cao et al. 1997; McCune & Grace 2002).”