Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of black–white biracials

By A. Ho, J. Sidanius, Amy J. C. Cuddy, Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2013

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Individuals who qualify equally for membership in more than one racial group are not judged as belonging equally to both of their parent groups, but instead are seen as belonging more to their lower status parent group. Why? The present paper begins to establish the role of individual differences and social context in hypodescent, the process of assigning multiracials the status of their relatively disadvantaged parent group. Specifically, in two experiments, we found that individual differences in social dominance orientation—a preference for group-based hierarchy and inequality—interacts with perceptions of socioeconomic threat to influence the use of hypodescent in categorizing half-Black, half-White biracial targets. Importantly, this paper begins to establish hypodescent as a “hierarchy-enhancing” social categorization.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d176465df5ef3afa3400c1859b83ed3c3fdf5a6a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Kurt Hugenberg
  2. David M. Amodio
  3. K. Kawakami
  4. Maria Abascal
  5. John F. Dovidio

Citations in the corpus