How UML is used
By Brian R. Dobing, J. Parsons. CACM, 2006
459 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Information Systems, Software
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d16faece2b00f6f9b479c31767116f9f198cbffe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Management Information Systems
In Software
Citations in the corpus
- Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN (2010, background): “There is research on the uptake and use of standards in related areas, such as the work on the adoption of UML in systems development (Dobing and Parsons, 2006, Kobryn, 1999, Siau and Loo, 2006); however it remains unclear how many of these insights apply to the BPM context.”
- Empirical assessment of MDE in industry (2011, background): “Surveys like these are important because they often discover that commonly-held perceptions may not hold true in practice [8].”
- Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field (2008, unknown): “Discussions questioning whether UML is used effectively by IT professionals (e.g., Erickson & Siau (2004), Dobing & Parsons (2006)) give inconsistent results about how UML is used and the extent to which it is used by IT professionals.”