The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective.

By Edwin A. Locke, Gary P. Latham. Motivation Science, 2019

502 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This chapter summarizes the authors’ joint development of the goal setting theory. The basic concept was based on more than 50 years of research and the formal theory has endured for 28 years (Locke & Latham, 1990). The theory was not developed through overgeneralization from only a few studies or by deduction but rather by induction. The inductions involved the integration of hundreds of studies involving thousands of participants. The theory initially focused solely on consciously set goals. To date, the goal setting theory has shown generality across participants, tasks, nationality, goal source, settings, experimental designs, outcome variables, levels of analysis (individual, group, division, and organizational), and time spans. The theory identifies both mediators and moderators of goal effects. Numerous subsequent studies since 1990 have supported the main tenets of the theory. New findings have enlarged our knowledge of the relevant mediators and moderators as well as showing new applications (Locke & Latham, 2013). Among these discoveries are when to set learning rather than performance goals, the effect of goals primed in the subconscious on job performance, and that goal effects are enhanced by having people write at length about them.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1652bc4f2dfe92956d11a63b285423804bbcf04

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation (2021, unknown): “…account the nature or quality of motivation, and instead focus solely on how much one is motivated (Kanfer & Chen, 2016; Kanfer et al., 2017)—of which Goal Setting Theory is a prime example, yet has nonetheless dominated the literature on employee motivation and practice (Locke & Latham, 2019).”
The application of Goal Setting Theory to goal setting interventions in sport: a systematic review (2021, background): “It should also be noted that Locke and Latham (2019) recently suggested that goal speci ﬁ city alone is insu ﬃ cient and that it should be combined collaboratively with goal di ﬃ culty for e ﬀ ective goal setting.”