Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar
By H. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, S. Ransom, P. Demorest, Z. Arzoumanian, Harsha Blumer, P. Brook, M. DeCesar, T. Dolch, J. Ellis and 17 more. Nature Astronomy, 2019
1,374 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Despite its importance to our understanding of physics at supranuclear densities, the equation of state (EoS) of matter deep within neutron stars remains poorly understood. Millisecond pulsars (MSPs) are among the most useful astrophysical objects in the Universe for testing fundamental physics, and place some of the most stringent constraints on this high-density EoS. Pulsar timing—the process of accounting for every rotation of a pulsar over long time periods—can precisely measure a wide variety of physical phenomena, including those that allow the measurement of the masses of the components of a pulsar binary system1. One of these, called relativistic Shapiro delay2, can yield precise masses for both an MSP and its companion; however, it is only easily observed in a small subset of high-precision, highly inclined (nearly edge-on) binary pulsar systems. By combining data from the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) 12.5-yr data set with recent orbital-phase-specific observations using the Green Bank Telescope, we have measured the mass of the MSP J0740+6620 to be 2.14-0.09+0.10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathbf{2}}{\mathbf{.14}}_{ - {\mathbf{0}}{\mathbf{.09}}}^{ + {\mathbf{0}}{\mathbf{.10}}}$$\end{document} M⊙ (68.3% credibility interval; the 95.4% credibility interval is 2.14-0.18+0.20\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathbf{2}}{\mathbf{.14}}_{ - {\mathbf{0}}{\mathbf{.18}}}^{ + {\mathbf{0}}{\mathbf{.20}}}$$\end{document} M⊙). It is highly likely to be the most massive neutron star yet observed, and serves as a strong constraint on the neutron star interior EoS. Cromartie et al. have probably found the most massive neutron star discovered so far by combining NANOGrav 12.5-yr data with radio data from the Green Bank Telescope. Millisecond pulsar J0740+6620 has a mass of 2.14 M⊙, ~0.1 M⊙ more massive than the previous record holder, and very close to the upper limit on neutron star masses from Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory measurements.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ocean Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d15333d7cbea05e98d75d6ac4e917ceea8cd3800
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Ocean Engineering
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter (2019, background): “We generate 150,000 random equations of state from each parameterization and then weight them, first, based only on the priors, then using our mass and radius measurement for PSRJ0030+0451, and finally also including the high measured masses of PSRJ1614 −2230 (Arzoumanian et al. 2018a), PSRJ0348+043”
- On the Sound Speed in Neutron Stars (2022, methodology): “We impose the mass measurements of J0348+0432 (Antoniadis et al. 2013; M= 2.01± 0.04Me) and of J0740+6620 (Cromartie et al. 2019; Fonseca et al. 2021; M= 2.08± 0.07Me) by rejecting EOSs that have a maximum mass M M2.”
- A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Implications for the Dense Matter Equation of State (2019, methodology): “With the tentative measurement of a - +2.17 0.10 0.11 Me pulsar (PSR J0740 +6620; Cromartie et al. 2019) the prior might even be updated to further exclude EoSs with small radii.”