Developmental states in transition: adapting, dismantling, innovating, not ‘normalizing’

By Linda Weiss. 2000

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d14a9f73ace427e01cd6f0e6b835409306a3af9a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. R. Stubbs
2. Jamie Peck
3. Jun Zhang
4. Linda Low
5. Henry S. C. Yeung

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Stubbs
2. Jun Zhang
3. Linda Low
4. Jamie Peck
5. R. Fletcher
6. C. Rammelt

Citations in the corpus

• The Singapore developmental state in the new economy and polity (2001, background): “The authoritarian–corporatist power does not quite approximate indiscriminate crony capitalism in Japanese conglomerates or keiretsus or Korean chaebols as a nationalistic mobilization for export-led growth is also inherent (Weiss and Hobson 1995: 160–1).”
• A variety of capitalism … with Chinese characteristics? (2013, background): “all-consuming (often nationalist) ‘will to develop’ (cf. Evans, 1995; Weiss, 2000; Deans, 2004).”
• What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The unfolding debate (2009, background): “In a series of publications during the 1980s, others took up this line of argument using South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore as their case studies (Deyo 1987; Gold 1986; Haggard and Moon 1983; Koo 1984; Lim 1983; Rodan 1989; Whang 1987).”