Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms—CORRIGENDUM

By C. Carpenter. International Organization, 2011

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d11afe4419271453039c4f71be39ea0f094b219c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Leonard Seabrooke
2. E. Tsingou

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Leonard Seabrooke
2. E. Tsingou

Citations in the corpus

• Distinctions, affiliations, and professional knowledge in financial reform expert groups (2014, background): “Persaud’s brokerage role could be understood as making him an ‘issue entrepreneur’ seeking to propagate a particular set of ideas and values (Carpenter 2011), such as ‘home–host regulation’ in the Geneva and Warwick reports, and ‘segmentation’ in all three reports, as can be seen in Table 1.”