Herschel-ATLAS: rapid evolution of dust in galaxies over the last 5 billion years

By L. Dunne, H. Gomez, E. D. Cunha, S. Charlot, S. Dye, S. Eales, S. Maddox, K. Rowlands, Daniel J. B. Smith, R. Auld and 31 more. 2010

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the first direct and unbiased measurement of the evolution of the dust mass function of galaxies over the past 5 billion years of cosmic history using data from the Science Demonstration Phase of the Herschel-Astrophysical Terahertz Large Area Survey (Herschel-ATLAS). The sample consists of galaxies selected at 250 m which have reliable counterparts from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) at z < 0.5, and contains 1867 sources. Dust masses are calculated using both a single-temperature grey-body model for the spectral energy distribution and also a model with multiple temperature components. The dust temperature for either model shows no trend with redshift. Splitting the sample into bins of redshift reveals a strong evolution in the dust properties of the most massive galaxies. At z= 0.4–0.5, massive galaxies had dust masses about five times larger than in the local Universe. At the same time, the dust-to-stellar mass ratio was about three to four times larger, and the optical depth derived from fitting the UV-sub-mm data with an energy balance model was also higher. This increase in the dust content of massive galaxies at high redshift is difficult to explain using standard dust evolution models and requires a rapid gas consumption time-scale together with either a more top-heavy initial mass function (IMF), efficient mantle growth, less dust destruction or combinations of all three. This evolution in dust mass is likely to be associated with a change in overall interstellar medium mass, and points to an enhanced supply of fuel for star formation at earlier cosmic epochs.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0d6d72d6bc4de864003ac083ae1630994ad0893

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Narayanan
  2. C. Casey
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. R. Somerville
  6. D. M. Alexander
  7. R. Ivison
  8. P. Capak

In Instrumentation

  1. D. Narayanan
  2. C. Casey
  3. P. Capak
  4. R. Ivison
  5. R. Somerville
  6. I. Smail
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. R. Dav'e

Citations in the corpus