Expert judgement elicitation for risk assessments of critical infrastructures

By Roger M. Cooke, Louis H. J. Goossens. 2004

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0c5e588535e7f0e15c68255c46a98c2aa3b0762

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. L. Rodic-Wiersma
2. A. Hale
3. Roger M. Cooke
4. Louis H. J. Goossens

In Statistics and Probability

1. Mark A. Burgman
2. M. McBride
3. L. Rodic-Wiersma
4. A. Hale
5. Tara G. Martin
6. Petra M. Kuhnert
7. Kerrie L. Mengersen
8. S. Low-Choy

Citations in the corpus

• Fifteen years of expert judgement at TUDelft (2008, methodology): “This paper will highlight two cases for which the paired comparisons Model is used, as the applications with the Classical Model, for which the Safety Science Group was responsible, are already published in many publications (Cooke and Goossens, 2004; Goossens and Cooke, 1997, 2001; Goossens and Har”
• Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science (2012, methodology): “Another approach to expert elicitation that is gaining recognition is Cooke’s method (Cooke 1991; Cooke & Goossens 2004; Cooke et al. 2008; Goossens et al. 2008; Conservation Biology Volume 26, No. 1, 2012 Aspinall 2010).”