Mental Health and Disasters: Distinctions that Matter: Received Social Support, Perceived Social Support, and Social Embeddedness after Disasters

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Weighing the Costs of Disaster (2010, background): “Support may come in the form of emotional reassurance, instrumental help with the immediate tasks of daily living, or the provision of information about how to do something or what the best course of action might be (Kaniasty & Norris, 2009).”
The Temporal Elements of Psychological Resilience: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Individuals, Families, and Communities (2015, background): “Knauer, N. J. (2002). September 11 attacks and surviving same-sex partners: Defining family through tragedy. Temple Law Review, 75, 31–98. Krystal, J. H., & Neumeister, A. (2009). Noradrenergic and serotonergic mechanisms in the neurobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder and resilience. Brain Res”
Predicting social psychological well-being following trauma: The role of postdisaster social support. (2012, background): “Notwithstanding some exceptions to the rule (see Kaniasty & Norris, 2009), many studies have documented high levels of received social support (i.e., reports of actual receipt of help) in the immediate aftermath of natural disasters (e.g., Beggs, Hainess, & Hurlbert, 1996; Bolin & Bolton, 1986;…”
Resilience to loss and potential trauma. (2011, background): “There are many different kinds of social resources, including emotional, instrumental, and informational support (Kaniasty & Norris 2009).”