Single‐species dynamic site selection

By Atte Moilanen, M. Cabeza. 2002

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d0ad222e146a032d2b8d24ea275bf9db088a061c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating cost-effectiveness of conservation management actions in an agricultural landscape on a regional scale (2007, background): “An increasing number of interdisciplinary studies considering both conservation goals and economic constraints emerged, many of them dealing with problems of optimum reserve site selection (Haight, 1995; Hof and Raphael, 1997; Moilanen and Cabeza, 2002; Nalle et al., 2004; Polasky et al.,”
Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns (2008, background): “…species or small set of species and a single economic activity such as forestry (e.g., Montgomery et al., 1994; Haight, 1995; Hof and Bevers, 1998; Marshall et al., 2000; Calkin et al., 2002; Moilanen and Cabeza , 2002; Nalle et al., 2004; Strange et al., 2006a,b; Holzkamper and Seppelt, 2007).”
Extinction threshold in metapopulation models (2003, methodology): “For example, in the management of natural metapopulations inhabiting fragmented landscapes, metapopulation viability analysis has been used as a tool to choose those fragments that should be conserved to maximize the conservation benefi ts from a limited amount of resources (Lindenmayer & Possingham”
Species in a dynamic world: Consequences of habitat network dynamics on conservation planning (2012, background): “…planning approaches have explicitly accounted for dynamics such as environmental stochasticity, habitat loss and climate change (e.g. Cabeza, 2003; Carroll et al., 2010; Costello and Polasky, 2004; Leroux et al., 2007; Moilanen and Cabeza, 2002; Strange et al., 2006; Visconti et al., 2010b).”
Effects of habitat degradation on the abundance, richness and diversity of raptors across Neotropical biomes (2009, background): “However, consequences of the resulting urban–rural gradients have been scarcely explored, even when they can have potentially serious effects on biodiversity (e.g., Moilanen and Cabeza, 2002 ).”
Connectivity, Probabilities and Persistence: Comparing Reserve Selection Strategies (2006, methodology): “One way is the inclusion of a metapopulation model which explicitly takes species-specific spatial dynamics into account (Moilanen and Cabeza 2002).”
Metapopulation theory, its use and misuse (2004, background): “... fritillary butterfly (M. cinxia; Hanski, Moilanen, Pakkala, & Kuussaari, 1996); predicting the rate of spread of the silver-spotted skipper (Hesperia comma) to a previously empty patch network (Thomas et al., 2001); selecting an optimal set of habitat patches for long-term metapopulation persist”
CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES (2005, background): “…has also been criticized on the grounds that it targets current representation of species in a reserve network rather than the long-term persistence of those species (e.g., Cowling et al. 1999, Williams and Araujo 2000, Calkin et al. 2002, Moilanen and Cabeza 2002, Cabeza and Moilanen 2003).”